Contents

flattr this!

 Table of Contents

Chapter Title Page

1

Predicting the ‘unpredictable’: the crisis that began in 2007 was not an unpredictable event, but an inevitable one caused by excessive debt-financed speculation. This chapter consists of extracts from the 1st edition, published in 2001, predicting the crisis we are now in.

1

2

No more Mr Nice Guy: As an academic discipline, Economics is incredibly resistant to change. Despite the failure of the vast majority of neoclassically-trained economists to foresee the crisis, the Neoclassical School will remain dominant unless public pressure forces change.

7

Part 1 Foundations: the logical flaws in the key concepts of conventional economics

3

The calculus of hedonism: The vision of a downward sloping “demand curve” intersecting an upward sloping “supply curve”is iconic in economics, yet Neoclassical economists long ago proved that the market demand curve can have any shape at all. The demand half of Neoclassical economics is therefore invalid.

38

4

Size does matter: The Neoclassical mantra that “profit is maximized by equating marginal cost and marginal revenue” is provably false. The “supply curve” doesn’t exist.

74

5

The price of everything and the value of nothing: The Neoclassical belief that costs of production rise as output rises is empirically false.

103

6

To each according to his contribution: Income distribution is determined not by merit but by relative bargaining power

129

Part 2 Complexities: issues omitted from standard courses that should be part of an education in economics

7

The holy war over capital: The Neoclassical model of production is a fallacy, as was conceded by Paul Samuelson decades ago.

142

8

There is madness in their method: Friedman’s argument that “assumptions don’t matter” has allowed Neoclassical economists to develop absurd theories. His defence that a theory should only be judged on the accuracy of its predictions is a good reason to reject Neoclassical economics today, after its failure to predict the economic crisis that began in 2007.

158

9

Let’s do the Time Warp again: Neoclassical economics has an infantile approach to dynamics.

175

10

Why they didn’t see it coming: As even as staunch a Neoclassical economist as Robert Solow said about modern Neoclassical macroeconomics, “How could anyone expect a sensible short-to-medium-run macroeconomics to come out of that set-up?”

203

11

The price is not right: The Neoclassical model of finance, known as CAPM, starts from the assumptions that all investors agree about the future, and that their predictions will come true. No wonder it fails to see financial crises coming!

270

12

Misunderstanding the Great Depression and the Great Recession: Ben Bernanke is not an expert on the Great Depression.

297

Part 3 Alternatives: different ways to think about economics

13

Why I did see ‘It’ coming: Minsky’s “Financial Instability Hypothesis” explains how capitalism periodically gets trapped in financial crises. From 1993 on, all the signs were there that a major one was long overdue.

326

14

A monetary model of capitalism: Capitalism is a monetary system, and must be modelled as such. I outline my model of a pure credit economy.

357

15

Why stock markets crash: Neoclassical theory portrays financial markets as always in equilibrium, or tending towards it. There are many sound alternative models that explain why Stock Markets are always far from equilibrium, and why they periodically crash.

378

16

Don’t shoot me, I’m only the piano: Mathematics is not the cause of the failures of economics. Instead, Neoclassical economists have used inappropriate mathematical techniques, sometimes made outright mathematical errors, and have dressed up absurd assumptions in mathematical form.

402

17

Nothing to lose but their minds: The so-called followers of Marx have actually preserved his worst mistakes, while ignoring advances he made to Classical economics because they undermine the case for socialism.

412

18

There are alternatives: There are many other Schools of thought within economics in addition to Neoclassical economics. This chapter gives a brief overview of the major alternatives.

444


Leave A Comment
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional     © 2011 Debunking Economics — All Rights Reserved.
Designed by Premium WordPress® Themes     Powered by WordPress®