Will America ever be great again?
Debunking Economics - the podcastApril 17, 2024x
399
45:5063.06 MB

Will America ever be great again?

Sadly for Donald Trump, America seems to have been doing quite well in his absence. It has weathered the pandemic and inflation better than most. GDP pr capita is rising faster than most places and consumer spending is on the up. In fact, the main reason the Federal Reserve isn’t cutting rates is because the economy is doing so well they don’t see the need for a sudden change. But there are lots of warts in the US too. Industrial production plateaued decades ago, crime is rampant, despite the high predisposition for putting people in prison, the rich-poor gap is as wide as ever and, even though America spends more than anyone on health, they have a comparatively low life expectancy. Has America lost its way, with China beating it on EVs and, possibly AI, with Boeing outstripping Boeing because their planes are less prone to falling apart? This week Phil and Steve talk about what needs to change, and what happens if more of the world decides not to conduct international trade in US dollars.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

[00:00:00] 1-800-Flowers.com is more than your birthday, anniversary or just because gift giving destination.

[00:00:06] We put our hearts into everything we do to help you celebrate all life special occasions

[00:00:11] with friends and family from our farmers and bakers, florists and makers.

[00:00:15] Everything from 1-800-Flowers is made with love every step of the way because we know

[00:00:19] that nothing is more important than delivering a smile.

[00:00:22] To learn more visit 1-800-Flowers.com slash ACAST.

[00:00:27] And what we want to do is bring manufacturing back to our country.

[00:00:37] Vice President Pence, good morning, is very much involved with me on that.

[00:00:43] It's one of my most important subjects.

[00:00:46] It's what the people wanted is one of the reasons I'm sitting here instead of somebody

[00:00:49] else sitting here.

[00:00:50] This is the Debunking Economics podcast with Steve Keen and Phil Dobbie.

[00:00:59] While America is doing okay it seems they've weathered the pandemic and inflation better

[00:01:03] than many but there's a lot that's wrong with America as well.

[00:01:06] Many people in America are very poor, many are in prison, they die earlier than most

[00:01:10] western countries and are they losing their way in manufacturing being beaten at their

[00:01:15] own game by China?

[00:01:17] And when it comes to aircraft, the Europeans.

[00:01:20] So have they just got lazy apart from the Magnificent Seven outside software?

[00:01:25] Is there anything America is good at these days or is it a nation in decline?

[00:01:29] Well look at that this week on the Debunking Economics podcast.

[00:01:39] So there are lots of signs that the US is doing well.

[00:01:42] So the GDP per capita in 2022 was over $76,000 compared to less than $55,000 in Canada for

[00:01:50] example, $46,000 in the UK, $36,000 in France, $15,000 in Russia.

[00:01:55] So I'm glad they're suffering a bit.

[00:01:57] Unlike most places that US figure has been growing quite sharply so their GDP per capita

[00:02:02] is improving.

[00:02:04] Consumer spending is rising up 0.8% in February for example.

[00:02:08] They have an unemployment rate of just 3.8%, one of the lowest in the world.

[00:02:12] The inflation rate is now just a little over 3%, one of the first to come down.

[00:02:17] In the US equities market it's growing its share of all of the global equities to such

[00:02:21] a point that countries are now seeing their local share markets decimated and a lot of

[00:02:26] that is because of AI and Big Tech, the world's biggest growth sector dominated by the

[00:02:30] Magnificent Seven so Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, Apple, Alphabet, Amazon and Tesla,

[00:02:37] all American.

[00:02:38] On the downside, they've got a high balance of trade deficits at $69 billion just for the

[00:02:44] month of February.

[00:02:45] It has a lower value of exports per capita than the UK, Australia and Germany so in

[00:02:50] 2022 they exported $8,760 per capita compared to $15,000 for the UK, almost $18,000

[00:02:59] for Australia and $25,000 for Germany and it has reserve currency which is seen as a

[00:03:04] bit of a safe haven with a lot of secure assets that can be invested in the US as

[00:03:09] well including US Treasuries but Steve we are also seeing gold prices now rising

[00:03:16] because Asian central banks have been buying it up so this could be a

[00:03:20] prelude to relying less on the US dollar so if the US dollar is being

[00:03:26] seen as less secure and reliable like for example if they had a geriatric

[00:03:31] in charge or a mad ego maniac running the country will the US continue along its

[00:03:36] merry way if the US doesn't continue to be the world's central currency how bad

[00:03:41] does it does it get if that stops being the case?

[00:03:45] Oh look I think that's a long way down the track because it's still obviously

[00:03:50] the dominant currency at the moment and it's the figures you're talking about

[00:03:55] they have comparative figures for America's growth versus the rest of the

[00:03:59] world it's nobody in commerce is going to be thinking about changing out of the

[00:04:07] dollar okay there's actually strengthening the dollar so yes if it lost

[00:04:11] if it lost its reserve currency status then it would certainly have some

[00:04:16] serious problems potentially because it's no longer that the world's premium in

[00:04:21] a manufacturing country it was after the Second World War it sort of lost

[00:04:26] that to Japan and then Japan lost its way with the bubble economy which gave America

[00:04:31] a bit of a fillip after the collapse of the Japanese economy in 1990 then along

[00:04:37] comes China now China yes it's having its property problems well and truly but

[00:04:43] you've got fundamentally the two economies both China and America are

[00:04:48] both running with strong fiscal policies you know large amounts of

[00:04:53] government spending large infrastructure projects and this is what I think the

[00:04:58] difference between America and the other Western countries is that Biden seems to

[00:05:03] be a bit of a black box you never know quite know what his motivations are

[00:05:08] whereas Trump you know far too much but it seems he's just basically saying

[00:05:14] look I'm not gonna I'll make the necessary words to make people think

[00:05:18] like concern myself about the deficit but I just continue spending on the

[00:05:22] program I've put together and from a modern monetary theory point of view from

[00:05:27] a simple money creation point of view that means the government's creating

[00:05:31] money and wow creating money helps capitalist economy turn over effectively

[00:05:35] so I don't see any danger of America losing the preeminent position of the

[00:05:42] international currency under current trends that could change with

[00:05:46] different trends but current ones and you're actually strengthening it rather

[00:05:50] than weakening it so and they have to actually don't they I mean if they've

[00:05:53] got a if they're exporting you know they've got this big balance of trade

[00:05:57] deficit but there's a lot of demand for US dollars if those US dollars aren't

[00:06:03] being created by the government where are they coming from well they're

[00:06:06] being created by the government the government is running a large deficit

[00:06:09] and hasn't hasn't cut back on it the obsession about you know the whole

[00:06:13] the debt ceiling nonsense is you know gone through that particular barrier yet

[00:06:18] again Biden just it seems to make them you know respect the debt ceiling blah

[00:06:23] blah blah and then continues on the other side once the political crisis has

[00:06:27] passed so which is only caused by hitting a numerical debt ceiling again

[00:06:33] so you've got you know a strong fiscal stance and very high interest rates

[00:06:39] which conventional economics is slowing the economy down and it would if

[00:06:44] that was passed through to individual borrowing rates and hit the cost of

[00:06:50] credit for the private sector but that's limited to some degree by the

[00:06:55] extent which Americans have used fixed rate mortgage loans rather than variable

[00:07:00] so you've got stimulus from the side of the government spending stimulus

[00:07:04] for the financial sector from the rate of interest on government bonds

[00:07:10] and the rest of the world particularly Europe is so obsessed about

[00:07:13] the beginning of a deficit down that their money supplies growing more slowly

[00:07:17] and wow so is their economy who to thought and yet this low value of exports

[00:07:22] per capita than the UK Australia and Germany so but that's that's that's

[00:07:27] that can be seen in another way and that is that in this one reason I use

[00:07:31] America whenever I'm doing an argument when using examples just a

[00:07:35] typical example almost always use American data because even though I

[00:07:39] rubbish the Americans for the extent which they fell through outsourcing

[00:07:43] and offshore manufacturing to the third world and that's the large reason

[00:07:48] why China grew so successfully was on the winning side of that trade

[00:07:52] but sometimes I'm not rubbish into that it's still the world's most

[00:07:55] self-contained economy and because it's so self-contained then it doesn't

[00:08:00] need exports you know as much as you know 30 years ago Japanese

[00:08:06] cars were superior they could they still made their own cars the Australian

[00:08:11] economy and that still applies today obviously and now we've got one of

[00:08:15] the world's premier manufacturers Tesla being American and it's only real

[00:08:20] rivals being Chinese yeah so but the bit if Australia you know things

[00:08:24] surpassed by the Chinese I should point out yeah yeah yeah yeah but what

[00:08:29] do you like Australia if if we could if Australia could no longer

[00:08:33] import cars and it would no longer have new cars period and that that is one

[00:08:38] reason you've got a high level export dependence on those other economy so

[00:08:42] you can grow courtesy of exports but if you have and this is what the

[00:08:45] Chinese economy before they fell for the Euro the German economy too

[00:08:50] you had a diversified industrial structure it could reduce almost

[00:08:53] anything and for that with that diversified structure also comes

[00:08:58] out as lower costs so all the stuff in the Neoclassicals rave on about

[00:09:03] comparative advantage actually put you in a worse situation America has

[00:09:07] fallen for that to some degree but because it has such a complete economy

[00:09:12] it's capable of surviving with a lower level of experts per capita yeah so

[00:09:16] I think what you're saying is if if if all of a sudden shipping stopped

[00:09:21] and there was no trade America would do alright the rest of us would be

[00:09:24] a bit stuff but America could continue on its merry way because it's largely

[00:09:28] a self-sufficient economy then you believe even when the on the oil that was

[00:09:31] the one big hole in there in their portfolio until fracking and our

[00:09:37] fracking is also large big holes but but at the moment at least it means

[00:09:42] it could supply its own gas so in gas and oil so it's it's got a

[00:09:48] capacity to absorb dramatic falls in its exports or rise in its imports and

[00:09:56] that's of course that that's where the reserve currency status comes in

[00:10:01] other countries like Australia the UK even Europe if they're running a

[00:10:06] trade deficit then they undermine the value the significance of their

[00:10:11] currencies America's as Janus argued and his the global Minotaur has to

[00:10:16] be in that situation to create the the American dollars circulating

[00:10:21] the rest of the world and enable the rest of the world to undertake

[00:10:24] commerce because we all use the American dollar so it's got this huge

[00:10:29] industrial base diminished but still large enough to miniproduce

[00:10:34] as most of its own needs and then it's got the reserve currency which

[00:10:37] means you can get away with running a deficit in trade in a way

[00:10:41] that other countries can't do no well in a way almost has to

[00:10:45] doesn't it if if the US dollars being used overseas there has to be a

[00:10:49] lot more US dollars and I think we gave the figure I mean I need to go

[00:10:54] back and check of one in 10 US dollar transactions actually

[00:10:57] involved the United States there's got to be way more US dollars

[00:11:01] than is required by the country itself to satisfy international

[00:11:05] trade between countries so all of that's got to be created by

[00:11:09] the US government somehow.

[00:11:10] Yeah and that well it's all by you know the banking sector I mean

[00:11:16] there's something to come out of if it's got to turn up in

[00:11:19] reserves I think they can be have to look at the dynamics of it

[00:11:23] all but it does require the government running a deficit

[00:11:28] and the deficit creates money this is the thing that the

[00:11:33] mainstream can't get their head around they do understand

[00:11:35] money creation so they're anti deficit but they're

[00:11:38] therefore again this is against the creation of fiat money.

[00:11:41] Now what both China and America are showing a creation of fiat

[00:11:45] money spurs a large amount of both public and private sector

[00:11:48] activity and those two economies you know China's looking

[00:11:52] fragile could receive the final collapse of its property

[00:11:55] bubble but but they've had an rates of growth that are far

[00:12:01] greater than the European countries which were obsessing

[00:12:03] about the deficit are not creating a great deal of fiat

[00:12:06] money there's not much credit money being created as well

[00:12:09] after the we're still in the the tail end of the impact of

[00:12:13] the global financial crisis on private sector borrowing so we

[00:12:16] have a monetary basically the monetary taps have been

[00:12:19] strangled in the rest of the world they're still running

[00:12:22] fairly effectively in America and China and that's one

[00:12:25] reason hey presto when you measure them yes it's in

[00:12:28] nominal dollar terms but they're still growing you know

[00:12:31] that the nominal dollars to an economic activity so

[00:12:36] I don't see any dilemma for America coming out of losing

[00:12:40] its reserve status it's other issues that are going to be

[00:12:42] important. So on China I spoke to a China expert for another

[00:12:46] podcast he said don't get too carried away or too

[00:12:48] up you know too concerned about this this property debt in

[00:12:53] China in that it was actually you know the collapse of

[00:12:55] these companies was actually implemented by the government

[00:12:58] because they worried that it was it was all getting

[00:13:00] carried away and he needed to be stopped and of course

[00:13:03] you know who will suffer will the the banks will you know

[00:13:07] pay for the default on debt who owns the banks oh yeah the

[00:13:10] government. The government does yeah and then that and that's a

[00:13:13] huge factor in its favor you know you've got a private

[00:13:16] monetary system which makes private loans but fundamentally

[00:13:19] that private money system is government owned and if it's

[00:13:22] not government only a bloody wall government controlled

[00:13:23] because the last thing you want to do is have the

[00:13:26] communist party knock on your door saying you didn't

[00:13:28] follow the most recent directive from the central

[00:13:30] committee. And meanwhile they're investing in the

[00:13:31] technique you know in the technology sector they're

[00:13:33] investing in areas where they don't have to play catch

[00:13:36] up because they can be in the same place as everywhere

[00:13:38] else which is now why they are selling more electric

[00:13:40] cars than anyone else anywhere in the world and you

[00:13:43] know I'm sure they'll do it in lots of other sectors

[00:13:45] as well. So just on you know this US dollars being

[00:13:50] spent overseas a lot of it comes back of course when

[00:13:53] people buy government bonds 40% of US government bonds

[00:13:57] due to treasuries are held by foreign investors. So what

[00:14:03] is there in it for the United States and it's not just

[00:14:05] the United States but they are leading so Japan's bonds

[00:14:09] now you know 30% of those are held by foreign

[00:14:13] investors as well and that's sort of like a you

[00:14:14] know a facet of the last 20 or 30 years and the

[00:14:19] euro area their bonds have sort of risen up to

[00:14:21] around 40% as well. So but the US is still at

[00:14:25] the top of the pack I think in terms of foreign ownership.

[00:14:28] What's in it for the US in doing that or can they just

[00:14:31] not stop it happening? We can't stop it happening

[00:14:32] because what you've got going on there is bond sales in

[00:14:35] the secondary market and this is the sort of thing which

[00:14:37] I mean a classical economists think they know

[00:14:39] this stuff they don't they're clueless with the way

[00:14:42] they analyze the monetary system but when the

[00:14:46] government spends more than it takes back in

[00:14:49] Texas which we call the deficit that gap creates

[00:14:54] reserves on the one side of the bank balance sheets and it

[00:14:57] creates deposits on the other side so it creates money.

[00:15:01] Then the reserves the reserves used to earn no interest

[00:15:04] and still earn less interest than bonds do.

[00:15:07] So the the sale and if the government is simply running a deficit

[00:15:11] all the time then its account at the central bank will go negative

[00:15:15] because you have you know spending going out which is greater than

[00:15:18] tax coming in and you weren't you weren't

[00:15:21] issuing any bonds let's say then at some point the spending being

[00:15:24] greater than tax would mean that the government's account the

[00:15:27] treasury account of the central bank could go negative.

[00:15:30] Now every government in the world pretty much is past laws requiring that

[00:15:33] central bank account not to go negative that's what bond sales do

[00:15:38] so when the bond sales occur the the the the

[00:15:41] the financial system as a whole has enough reserves to purchase the

[00:15:47] bonds whether it's this way there's

[00:15:50] so many bonds outstanding already that there aren't enough reserves

[00:15:54] available to buy the current deficit and this is

[00:15:57] you know even a deficit of 10% of GDP let's say

[00:16:01] which is about twice the American level that would mean one percent of

[00:16:05] if you did just a monthly auction that it'd be less than one percent

[00:16:08] of GDP and turns to the level of sales. So all you need is reserves at that

[00:16:12] level and of course there's bonds which are 100%

[00:16:15] all the central bank has to do is buy some of those bonds off the private

[00:16:18] banks to create the reserves therefore the bonds can be purchased there's no

[00:16:22] such thing as bond vigilantes and many bonds won't be sold.

[00:16:26] The but the next point is once the banks have bought that they then

[00:16:33] what the primary auction they then sell those bonds not all of them but a

[00:16:37] fair slab of them to other buyers and that can be

[00:16:41] anybody so the so the bonds that are turning up in foreign

[00:16:44] countries are most likely those which are sold on the secondary market by

[00:16:48] the banks and primary dealers themselves. To investment funds that are looking and

[00:16:51] going well this is a secure place to stick our money can't go wrong with

[00:16:56] US Treasuries or maybe even foreign central banks not foreign central banks foreign banks

[00:17:01] as well looking for a safe place to part their money.

[00:17:05] So but if that's so what so the effect of that though is if these bonds are

[00:17:09] being sold overseas then that is US dollars being repatriated back to America

[00:17:16] Exactly isn't it exactly so and they come back and they end up in the financial sector of course

[00:17:21] so this is actually fueling the financial sector out far with the feed the industrial sector than

[00:17:25] the financial but that's the impact of those bonds being sold internationally.

[00:17:30] The on seller of the bonds whether that's a bank or a non-bank financial institution

[00:17:35] sells the bonds and gets reserves as a result of the you know what they deposit accounts

[00:17:42] if they're a non-bank reserves if they're a bank and then the banks that get the reserves bank

[00:17:50] are then encouraged to buy more bonds and the non-bank financial institutions get reserves

[00:17:55] are encouraged to buy other financial assets. So you know it feels the financial engine in

[00:18:00] America which is a bit like fueling Beasel but that's what they do.

[00:18:06] Right but what happens if because China obviously is buying up a lot of these

[00:18:10] bonds or has historically starts to wind back what if there's less interest in buying US bonds

[00:18:17] particularly from you know from countries that think that the US has got too much control and

[00:18:22] they want to diversify more what happens then does that make any difference at all to the

[00:18:28] stunning of the US and it just makes the US financial sector a little less well off.

[00:18:32] Yeah but also what it will mean is if that has any impact upon the reserve rate of interest

[00:18:38] the rate of interest rate that banks charge each other in the overnight market then the central

[00:18:42] bank comes in and does some of the buying and this is the I mean the huge hole I mean you remember

[00:18:48] the old song was a hole in the bucket dear Elisa dear Elisa the hole in the bucket of the

[00:18:53] neoclassical attitude towards government debt is that if there if there was any ever any problem

[00:18:58] the central bank could buy 100% of the outstanding bonds literally can do it because all they've

[00:19:05] got to do is say oh the total value of the bonds outstanding as let's say it's a 30 trillion dollars

[00:19:12] it's not quite that much about 25 I guess but they're 30 30 trillion we're going to put the

[00:19:17] number 30 trillion and all the relevant bank accounts of the reserve accounts of the banks

[00:19:21] at the central bank whether that's directly if they're actually dealing with banks or indirectly

[00:19:26] if they're dealing with a non-bank financial institution that have bought bonds off the

[00:19:30] banks put 30 trillion and all those accounts and then record oh dear 30 trillion worth of bonds the

[00:19:36] Federal Reserve now owns what's happened to the government's debt problem yeah all right so what

[00:19:41] you're painting is a picture in all of this of infallibility do you know that America no I wouldn't

[00:19:48] say infallibility but I'd say in vulnerability yeah all right well when we come back I just want

[00:19:54] to look at what you know what could potentially be going wrong because I'm whether actually all

[00:19:58] of these good points is making a country that's a bit lazy and is that part of the problem for

[00:20:02] America as well so that is more of an issue yeah so look at all that when we come back on the

[00:20:07] D Banking Economics podcast it's me and Steve Keen back in a second with LinkedIn jobs we tap

[00:20:14] into a network of more than a billion professionals to help you find quality professionals quickly

[00:20:18] and easily for any role you need marketing wizards found them software engineers found

[00:20:23] that project manager I could never seem to hire and found LinkedIn jobs quickly matches your roles

[00:20:29] with candidates with the right skills and experience in fact 86% of small businesses get a qualified

[00:20:33] candidate within 24 hours post your first job for free and get started at linkedin.com

[00:20:38] slash spoken that's linkedin.com slash spoken terms and conditions apply finding your perfect

[00:20:43] home was hard but thanks to burrow furnishing it has never been easier burrows easy to assemble

[00:20:49] modular sofas and sectionals are made from premium durable materials including stain

[00:20:53] and scratch resistant fabrics so they're not just comfortable and stylish they're built to last

[00:20:58] plus every single burrow order ships free right to your door right now get 15 off your first order

[00:21:04] at burrow.com slash a cast that's 15 off at burrow.com slash a cast

[00:21:13] this is the debunking economics podcast with Steve Keen and Phil Dobby

[00:21:19] so in the first part we're talking about you know what a fantastic opportunity the United States has

[00:21:25] and we know how well it's doing in big tech for example how so much of the world's investment

[00:21:31] now is in just seven companies which are all American companies and how stock exchanges

[00:21:36] around the world are suffering because of that and you know the fact that the US keeps on

[00:21:41] issuing money it's got in more than enough money to continue to see growth in the economy

[00:21:47] but in this next part I want to look at whether actually we're actually seeing that growth happening

[00:21:51] so has America become lazy because of its position and I think there's lots of evidence that there is

[00:21:58] so I mentioned electric cars a few times so Steve and they don't like electric cars as much as the

[00:22:03] rest of the world is fair to say so USC electric vehicle purchases in 2023 were half that of

[00:22:10] Europe 1.6 million for North America compares to 8.4 million for China as well you know and you've

[00:22:17] been to the States you see how they like these big gas guzzling large vehicles and I think the

[00:22:24] fact that they are destroying the planet is part of the attraction for them but they're making

[00:22:28] less cars that's the interesting thing so last year the US made 10.6 million cars in 2016

[00:22:33] it was 12.2 million shouldn't that number be going up wouldn't you have thought that you

[00:22:37] know as there's particularly as there's a demand for you know this transition to electric vehicles

[00:22:41] and they're making less than you know many other parts of the world proportionally

[00:22:45] that electric you would have thought that they would be stepping up production wouldn't you

[00:22:49] you know this is I mean this is a classic technological shift and and partially this

[00:22:54] comes down to the nature of manufacturing and corporate management over the last 40 years

[00:23:01] because the obsession and corporate management we're seeing it with Boeing right now

[00:23:05] was to outsource everything pay the minimum possible wages to your workers

[00:23:10] rush stuff through production systems and so on and because you're relying upon a diversified

[00:23:15] bunch of suppliers you can't change things particularly quickly but what's happening with

[00:23:21] with the Musk initially and now the Chinese as well they're vertically integrated and so if

[00:23:26] they want to change something of design it's not a case of having to contact 50 suppliers to

[00:23:31] try to negotiate that they all change manufacturing the parts they put together in a coherent way

[00:23:38] pardon me it's simply telling the production line down the end we've changed the production line

[00:23:42] tells the further this is the change we're making what do you guys have to do to adapt to it

[00:23:46] so vertical integration has worked extremely well for Musk and it also says to be working

[00:23:51] for the Chinese vehicle manufacturers that have come along as well and technologically they're

[00:23:56] leaving the rest of America behind well I mean Musk is leaving America behind as well isn't

[00:24:00] it because he's starting to you know put production facilities outside America but how much behind so

[00:24:06] well last year 11 million just under 11 million cars as I said in the United States 30 million

[00:24:11] in China I mean China wasn't really making cars five years ago not through any great degree

[00:24:16] now it's making 30 million them a year which is twice what Europe makes Europe made 18 million

[00:24:21] last year which is still a lot more than the United States so I mean this big car manufacturer all

[00:24:26] of a sudden seems to have lost its way yeah I mean and this is something which I mean I remember

[00:24:31] being involved in seeing the first the free trade zones in China in 81 82 and their entire

[00:24:37] intention was focused on getting the engineering now from America as well as

[00:24:42] developing their own local capitalist class that had both extremely successfully but the

[00:24:47] culture in China is dominated by engineers the culture in America is dominated by economists

[00:24:52] hiding to nothing that the engineers are going to win and and and this is that that

[00:24:59] orientation applies and the government it applies in the private private sector as well

[00:25:03] so I think I'm ever seeing actually a clip of Musk actually being asked a question about

[00:25:09] but I think the leading today's leading Chinese automotive manufacturer and he's giggled

[00:25:15] and then the person said why are you giving me said have you seen their cars

[00:25:18] the thing is they've done exactly the same thing that Musk is doing with SpaceX

[00:25:23] iterative design and five years later you're not laughing anymore no well I'm driving a Chinese car

[00:25:29] I'm driving a Chinese Volvo and electric Volvo it's a very smart car it's got all the tech in

[00:25:35] there it's you know the drive is smooth I mean it's an it's an impressive vehicle

[00:25:41] and yeah so you what China now has I mean of course all grew up thinking

[00:25:48] China means inferior goods that's changed now hasn't it and the innovation is there as well

[00:25:53] so that's that makes them a force to be reckoned with the funny thing is I mean if you go back far

[00:25:57] enough in history that they would actually stood for refined goods and this is you know they're

[00:26:01] done I'm not saying that China's got a century and a half long memory maybe they have but

[00:26:06] the reason we used to call crockery China is because the best crockery was made in China

[00:26:12] when when the British wanted to export to China to get these you know Chinese silks and China is

[00:26:18] crockery and so on they didn't have anything that China has wanted except opium and they then

[00:26:24] enforce the opium and selling of opium inside China which led to the opium wars with China

[00:26:29] trying to prevent the opium coming inside the country for its own benefit

[00:26:33] and the Americans and British fought to keep the opium trade open and that helped destroy a large

[00:26:38] part of China's culture and so on so yes it's a change you know China's goods are crap they were

[00:26:44] crap because of the crap where they were treated by particularly Britain but also America and

[00:26:49] and France and so on in the colonial period and they're basically re-establishing their

[00:26:53] preeminence they had back in the olden days so in some ways this is a return to normie

[00:26:58] so purchases of electric vehicles 16 percent of all new cars in the UK are now fully electric in

[00:27:05] i think in in europe it's 12 percent in norway over 90 percent of all cars are either pure electric

[00:27:12] new cars are either pure electric or hybrids haven't got the pure electric figure but anyway 16

[00:27:17] percent in the uk is the interesting one because in the united states it's 7.6 percent now we know

[00:27:22] if donald trump comes along he's going to say my goodness 30 million cars a lot of them

[00:27:26] electric coming from china we're only managing to sell 11 million cars i know what i'm going to do

[00:27:32] i'm going to impose this 100 tariff on cars from china and the effect of that is going to be well

[00:27:37] there's not a lot of interest in electric vehicles anyway so they'll just that that electric

[00:27:41] vehicle market will just dry up some people will buy a Tesla but a lot of people continue using

[00:27:46] petrol and diesel cars in the united states because they've got lots of petrol which they or gas

[00:27:51] which they which they can get because they've got the reserves there from from their fracking so

[00:27:57] you can see how that's going to go so they so um you know they're going to do what they can to

[00:28:02] prop up their their own industry not helping the climate a great deal though are they in the

[00:28:07] process no i'm well i don't think anybody's helping the planet the planet will help itself

[00:28:12] in a short while that'll it'll sort all the troubles out but uh yeah the i mean they're

[00:28:19] it is crazy the extent to which americans are still in the gas-guzzling mindset

[00:28:24] so the european approach to electricity and electric vehicles and modernity is very much

[00:28:29] out of step with american thinking but you know it's we're coming back to the strength of the

[00:28:34] american economy and it's it is a weird mixture because it's got away with running its productive

[00:28:42] capacity down as much as it has because it's so big to begin with in the first place and

[00:28:49] and that that is why you got those figures for the low you know proportion of exports per head or

[00:28:57] exports compared to GDP yeah it's it's just a sign of how big america was in the first place

[00:29:02] but in some ways that they're going to continue it they've got to turn that outsourcing around

[00:29:07] again and get get back to vertical integration and and start producing domestically what they've

[00:29:12] ended up importing but they've lost the skill base and this is this is a huge problem whereas

[00:29:17] the chinese have got an enormous reservoir of well-trained engineers both in government and the

[00:29:23] private sector who can build these infrastructure projects and come up with things like you know

[00:29:29] within five years go from producing no electric cars and being a laughing stock to being the

[00:29:34] world's largest manufacturer of electric stars and having some very satisfied customers

[00:29:38] so if you look on the fred database at total manufacturing production for the united states

[00:29:44] and compared to other countries like the uk for example you know which we will often diss for not

[00:29:49] being you know manufacturing based economy if you look in the united states though around the year

[00:29:54] 2000 well let me just blow it up so I can see it yeah around the turn of the century manufacturing

[00:30:02] production just flatlined in the united states it's not been growing at all if you look at it

[00:30:07] for the uk it's still growing so there's something going wrong when your manufacturing

[00:30:14] production just flatlines and has been for two and a half decades but that's where america is

[00:30:20] yeah like that that's where I think the financial issue and the whole impact of being the reserve

[00:30:24] currency is is a poison shallots because it gives the financial sector enormous strength and we're

[00:30:30] talking about you know ways in which that applies earlier in the show about the sales

[00:30:34] of bonds and so on and the amount of cash that comes back when the bonds are bought by overseas

[00:30:39] countries and companies that are then used by the american financial sector for yet more

[00:30:43] purchases of assets and so on so it gives enormous strength to the financial sector but it cripples

[00:30:48] the manufacturing and this this is you know again my greatest laments is the fact that

[00:30:54] canes lost out to harry dexter white in breton woods because if that hadn't happened we might

[00:30:59] have had the bank cause in international currency and we wouldn't have this bloated american financial

[00:31:05] sector and at the same time you wouldn't have the desiccated american manufacturing sector so

[00:31:12] i'm wondering whether over 80 years time we're finally starting to learn the lesson that harry

[00:31:17] was wrong and jm was correct and with that with that loss goes the you know goes dissipation

[00:31:24] disappears doesn't it as you say because you haven't got it you haven't got engineers in

[00:31:27] chance you've got the and then this is what this is one reason like i know the em i've avoided talking

[00:31:33] about the mmt line exports or a cost import for a benefit for a long time because i i didn't

[00:31:38] want to kneecap the incredible success mmt has had at changing people's attitudes towards government

[00:31:44] spending and how government spending is financed that's fabulous but the the exports

[00:31:48] are a cost import for a benefit it's classic static trader a trader advantage you know you get

[00:31:53] a physical thing back and return for a piece of paper that's a trade in your your favorite it's

[00:31:58] a trader's perspective not a money perspective which is it not a money perspective that's correct

[00:32:03] it's it which is weird but doubly weird is that it ignores the impact upon innovation and training

[00:32:11] because if you're getting if you're you know sending overseas pieces of paper and getting

[00:32:16] machinery back you tend to forget to train people who can make machinery yeah whereas the

[00:32:21] reverse applies in china are the incredible capability to design an engineer and manufacture

[00:32:27] and and that that gives it a greater not just growth potential which you know i think is going to

[00:32:32] become a dirty word in coming decades but self sustainability capability and that's vital well

[00:32:39] maybe they're ahead of the care of them you know because they're demonstrating

[00:32:42] gear you know zero growth in manufacturing right now but if you look at the airline

[00:32:48] so do you mentioned uh you mentioned boeing or boing there might be a appropriate name

[00:32:55] make the plane down a rubber so that when they crash they could yeah or just yeah rubber plane

[00:33:00] so when they crash they just bounce back up again i'm a bit uncomfortable we we we we

[00:33:04] we need a new band called boeing crash opera that will yeah yeah they were an Australian

[00:33:09] band when they might be a lot of people boom crash opera boom crash opera that was it yeah

[00:33:14] boeing crash opera for a while a school band Australian band for a while ago but anyway

[00:33:19] if you look back in recent history i mean boeing an airbus sold a similar number of planes each year

[00:33:27] but now it seems like the wheels have fallen off at well actually it's anything that hasn't

[00:33:31] fallen off quite literally in some cases it's the only thing that hasn't fallen off is it

[00:33:35] it's the only thing that's been bolted on properly and so the thing that was an engine cover

[00:33:39] the other day as well so it's just yeah engine cover flew off yeah so anyway last year boeing

[00:33:45] 1314 orders for aircraft compared to 2084 for airbus so they've got problems at boeing as well you

[00:33:54] know given that they've historically have been very similar numbers so again you know here's an

[00:33:58] example America losing its way of an industry that it was once very dominant in yeah and I think

[00:34:03] that's an important lesson of when you let the marketing types and not the marketing MBA types

[00:34:08] take over a company one fun incident from my earlier life before I became an academic I used to be a

[00:34:14] journalist for a computer magazine and ended up interviewing Wayne Ratliff who is the designer

[00:34:19] of D-Base 2 which in the days was the dominant database language for my pro PCs and he literally

[00:34:27] got off the plane fuming about MBAs because he said Harvard MBAs are taken over Ashton Tate

[00:34:34] which is the company that distributed D-Base 2 and all they wanted to do is get revenue in through

[00:34:39] the door and what what Wayne wanted to do was get away from the very simplistic database structure of

[00:34:45] D-Base 2 and go to what's called an entity relationship database structure where the

[00:34:51] you have entities you know person and product and the relationship is sale and the relationship

[00:34:57] itself contains the data it's a very sophisticated approach to database design

[00:35:01] companies are going to be called Emerald Bay and he could not get the the MBA so no no no don't do that

[00:35:07] they just add more databases so D-Base 2 can handle two databases D-Base 4 I think was four

[00:35:12] then you got D-Base 10 that can handle 10 databases but you still had to have the poor

[00:35:17] bloody programmer going through all the you know if the loop to loop internal loops external

[00:35:22] loops etc etc raised a program in the language so I know it very well whereas the entity

[00:35:27] relationship is far superior what happened to Ashton Tate and D-Base 2 they're both

[00:35:31] the debase they've both folded they've both disappeared so by focusing upon profitability

[00:35:36] and returns and sales rather than engineering and excellence they screwed a great company and a

[00:35:42] great a great nobunate nascent products and this seems to be happening across America the

[00:35:49] MBA dominance and the moneymen rather than the engineers taking over that's probably the

[00:35:54] greatest coup on the history of American capitalism and the worst something else which is ignored is

[00:35:59] the rising inequality in America so those in the upper income tier if you had a upper middle and

[00:36:05] lower they're counted for 29 percent of all the income in 1970 that rose to 48 percent in 2018

[00:36:11] according to Pew Research lower income accounted for 10 percent that's not really changed the

[00:36:16] change actually come in the middle and middle and higher income earners middle income earners

[00:36:21] accounted for 62 percent of all income that's now fallen to 43 percent so middle America is losing out

[00:36:27] to the higher one-third of the population in terms of of income and if you look at the genie

[00:36:33] coefficient which of course you know is a measure of the relative inequalities within

[00:36:38] the country so zero means everyone has the same wealth and one or 100 percent means that one

[00:36:43] person's got it all and everyone else has gone nothing well America is at 40 percent so the

[00:36:48] worst it is the higher the number the higher the degree of inequality so America's at 40 40 percent

[00:36:53] or 0.4 the UK and Germany on 32 percent Holland is less than 26 percent I mean there are worse

[00:37:00] places South Africa's at 63 percent but this inequality is bad in America and it just seems

[00:37:06] to be getting worse and there doesn't seem to be public policy which is addressing that because

[00:37:11] and I think it's part of that is the American psyche that everybody should be able to get ahead

[00:37:16] and if you've fallen behind then that's your problem but the good news is that you can get ahead

[00:37:22] even though it's impossible everyone still believes they have a chance yeah I think that's a large part

[00:37:26] of it as well I mean and like I'm thinking fine there's also you know the elite doesn't really

[00:37:32] worry about the the working class so it's even Paul Samuelsen once described America as being

[00:37:37] characterized by rampant capitalists with a cowed working class so you'd think that it'd be coming

[00:37:44] out of the mouth of a Marxist rather than a person who'd you know constructed the neoclassical

[00:37:49] letter first of today but that's his his you know realistic statement at one stage and

[00:37:55] that basically means you're disparaging the poor that's the poor that's your own problem as you

[00:37:59] were saying in the inverse earlier whereas if you go to China and and and you go to Europe

[00:38:06] not as extreme as China but most other countries have some belief in a shared a collective

[00:38:11] reality even only Schwartz negate he's only swarming I got a speech saying about don't call me

[00:38:17] a self-made man whereas the mythology of self-made man still dominates America equally it means you

[00:38:23] got a self-made failure but when you have societies that talk about a need to make sure

[00:38:28] everybody we have your collectively in this we need to make sure everybody has opportunity

[00:38:32] you get more opportunity coming out of that as a result in Europe and China then you get

[00:38:37] in the so-called land of opportunity America one in Europe we've got a sense of community which

[00:38:41] they don't have in America and I'm sure I'll get shot down by Americans listening to this podcast

[00:38:45] but I feel like you know there's the sense that you belong in your place a lot more

[00:38:50] in this country and that means looking after everybody else in the community in which

[00:38:53] you live and then I recommend searching an army schwarz negator or whatever they call it

[00:39:02] closure speeches at American University saying how much he was made by the

[00:39:05] contributions of other people including the people he met at Gold's gym when he turned up in

[00:39:09] America as an 18 year old bodybuilder so I'm not a self-made man yeah that's amazing but

[00:39:16] yeah so this this belief in individuality I think is a large part of what's making America

[00:39:22] dysfunction both for individuals and the collective yeah all right and then it is this idea as

[00:39:27] well isn't it in America that everything has to be done by private enterprise and that doesn't

[00:39:30] always work so life expectancy in America is 80 in the UK it's 83 in Sweden it's 84 you know where

[00:39:37] I'm going with this Spain it's 85 five years more than America and yet health spending per

[00:39:43] capita in America in 2022 was $12,550 in the UK it was less than 5,500 so we are spending they

[00:39:53] are spending well over twice as much as the UK but they are dying three years earlier that's

[00:39:59] that's free enterprise for you yeah that's the cold hard numbers yeah and there are there are so many

[00:40:06] elements like that it's there are areas where you know you want the innovation to occur definitely

[00:40:13] but there are times when you look at the argument about it's all between a buyer and a seller and

[00:40:18] you get to you know work out a market plus that doesn't involve exploitation when you face a life

[00:40:23] threatening illness and I have had that experience you don't look for the cheapest

[00:40:27] person you look for the one who's got the highest reputation there's no way you've got any bargaining

[00:40:31] power in that situation so you're powered a fortune unless there's a government system to meet to

[00:40:36] to mean that everybody pays a similar amount with some potentially some flexibility that's what

[00:40:43] the rest of the world has America's called that socialist the rest of the world recognizing

[00:40:49] the power and balance in health all the rest of the world calls it socialism and actually

[00:40:53] says well you know that's not a swear word actually that's what we are we don't wear

[00:40:56] clothes in America it is a swear word nothing wrong with the way of socialism if it keeps the

[00:41:00] cogs of society turning is there and then the other one in America 737 people out of each 100,000

[00:41:08] people are in prison in England it's 148 in Australia it's 125 despite that so you know

[00:41:17] 148 pair 100,000 in prison in England compared to 737 in America despite that

[00:41:25] pair 100,000 6.4 people are murdered in America compared to one in the UK Australia has a murder

[00:41:35] rate we're even lower than I think it's 0.8 so got lost by another thing you know I can't

[00:41:41] figure this out at all it's obviously just the American psyche about how being able to carry

[00:41:45] guns but you know many more people being murdered many more people in prison and that

[00:41:52] situation's not improving either yeah I mean this this comes down to the inability of the west

[00:41:57] in general I think to think in terms of a balance between extremes so you either

[00:42:03] you're left-wing or you're right you're conservative or you're progressive you're

[00:42:06] a socialist or you're a free enterprise person they don't seem to see any potential for

[00:42:10] combinations of those and I love once having mixed economy we used to call it yeah but even

[00:42:17] as a mixed philosophy the Buddhist philosophy the under of yin and yang there's no perfect

[00:42:22] extremes aren't perfect it's the balance between the two I remember once seeing a little movie

[00:42:27] explaining the growth of a Buddhist philosophy where it came from and apparently the story

[00:42:32] goes sitting beneath a tree some famous tree somewhere in Asia he heard overheard a master

[00:42:38] teaching a young not guitarist but whatever the device was stringed instrument saying no if you make

[00:42:46] it too tight if you make it too loose it won't make a sound at all if you make it too tight it'll

[00:42:51] cause a you know ugly sound the balance is in the middle and that's what gave would have the

[00:42:57] idea of balance and that's partly eastern philosophy the western philosophy we get left

[00:43:02] versus right now extremes and and the thing the extremes function less well than a balanced

[00:43:07] system yeah so where does you know climate change aside where does America sit in 10 years time

[00:43:15] it's you know if it's still you think it'll still be the world's reserve currency so it will still

[00:43:20] be a the financial sector is all right but if we continue to see this slide in manufacturing and

[00:43:25] we still see this rising inequality if we see this crime rate continuing which will only get

[00:43:30] worse of course as inequality increases what happens to America yeah well it's again a sheer scale

[00:43:37] is is you know size and everything but it's a dam side bigger than number two so the fact that it's so

[00:43:42] self-contained so still self-contained will give it a capacity to reverse direction on occasions if

[00:43:49] if needed but overall I think it's going to continue losing out to China in terms of technological

[00:43:56] innovation and the only hope it's got is reshoring a lot of its production facilities

[00:44:03] which is happening to some degree now but they're going to find that they simply can't build those

[00:44:08] facilities up as fast as they'd like because they haven't got the trained workforce anymore

[00:44:12] because of all the outsourcing they did so I think that's the main

[00:44:16] damage that America has done to itself it doesn't have the engineering that it needs to

[00:44:22] build up its base capacity again which you think it will need to whereas China's got that

[00:44:28] base so China's capacity to innovate and produce new commodities or move in a different direction

[00:44:35] for energy systems and so on I think is much higher than America's so you know I think this

[00:44:40] we're seeing the end of the American century it'll still be dominant politically and militarily

[00:44:47] because of little things called nuclear weapons but it's lost that dominance over the

[00:44:53] overall philosophy of the planet and what about it's going to seem gold prices rising a great

[00:44:57] deal and that is because central banks in BRICS countries have been buying up gold

[00:45:05] which sort of you know it's got people talking about whether that's to build up reserves I mean

[00:45:10] it's a mistake on their part obviously but building up reserves to back a reserve you know

[00:45:16] a currency that they're going to use as their means of exchange rather than using the US dollar

[00:45:21] I mean if I mean does that seem likely and it's a possibility I mean the the oil countries

[00:45:26] have often spoken about about that desire to get away from having Saudi Arabia's in on this

[00:45:30] supposedly yeah so yeah so I mean if China is buying a whole load of oil from the Saudis and

[00:45:38] buying in whatever this new currency is going to be called or even just buying it in the yen

[00:45:43] I mean what does that do to to demand for the US dollar I mean it's it's it's it's

[00:45:48] going to hurt a little bit doesn't it? Yeah it could potentially mean the Euro-Solar falls

[00:45:52] because the the Foreigner I say that I could as you were saying earlier the need to have

[00:45:56] like 90% of American dollars circulating outside America but if you knock out the oil trade and

[00:46:01] they get a deal between the Chinese and the Saudis on that front and a range of others

[00:46:06] and equally with Russia for minerals and so on then you drastically reduce that demand and yeah

[00:46:11] the dollar dollar will fall now that actually costs of costs of imports in America increases

[00:46:16] but then it's perhaps less of an issue if they are so self so so so self-sufficient I mean it

[00:46:21] makes their exports cheaper so if they reindustrialize they can export cheaper. They need to do that but

[00:46:27] you know talk about giving themselves a handicap. The handicap being that they are the reserve

[00:46:32] currency. Yeah that handicap and then using that to their advantage and then as a result of it

[00:46:39] wiping out not wiping up drastically reducing their capacity for manufacturing and innovation

[00:46:44] and that's when Boeing is the classic example of that I think that Boeing going down is a

[00:46:50] sign of how far American manufacturing has gone down. But they must be worried about that so you

[00:46:55] assume as you say these things can turn around can't they? It's just a question of recognizing the

[00:47:00] extent of it all and coming up with a policy and looking at how you rebalance things which is

[00:47:05] what we've been talking about and that seems to be a bit of a problem that the country suffers

[00:47:08] from. Anyway interesting discussion we'll see how America does traverse the next decade. It's

[00:47:15] going to be interesting to watch. Good to talk this week Steve. See you soon.

[00:47:21] 1-800-FLOWERS.COM is more than your birthday anniversary or just because gift giving destination.

[00:47:33] We put our hearts into everything we do to help you celebrate all life special occasions with

[00:47:38] friends and family from our farmers and bakers florists and makers everything from 1-800-FLOWERS

[00:47:44] is made with love every step of the way because we know that nothing is more important than

[00:47:48] delivering a smile. To learn more visit 1-800-FLOWERS.COM slash ACAST that's 1-800-FLOWERS.COM slash ACAST

[00:47:59] If you've enjoyed listening to debunking economics even if you haven't you might also

[00:48:04] enjoy the Y-Curve each week Roger Hearing and I talked to a guest about a topic that is very

[00:48:09] much in the news that week it's lively it's fun it's informative what more could you want

[00:48:14] so search the Y-Curve in your favorite podcast app or go to ycurve.com to listen